Report Bug

Ikiatl wrote:

Loved your Langford Pairing blog post. Found a small error in the proof of sufficiency. I think the value of \( c \) should be \( 4x - 1 \) and not \( 4x - 3 . \) Great blog post though!

18 May 2023 19:09 UTC | #1 of 3 comments

Presh wrote:

Wonderful Langford Pairing post. By the way, I believe there is a small typo in the formula for \( c. \) It should be \( c = 4x - 1. \)

05 Jun 2023 22:40 UTC | #2 of 3 comments

Susam Pal wrote:

Thank you, Ikiatl and Presh, for your comments. The formula for \( c \) indeed had a typo. Although I wrote the correct values for \( c \) obtained from the formula \( c = 4x - 1 \) in the examples, the formula itself was written incorrectly as \( c = 4x - 3. \) I have corrected Langford Pairing to use \( c = 4x - 1 \) now.

12 Jun 2023 07:18 UTC | #3 of 3 comments