0.999...
By Susam Pal on 09 Dec 2001
What is the difference between and Note
that the ellipsis denotes a never-ending sequence of 9s. Is the
difference a small but positive real number? If so, what is that
number? Or is the difference simply It turns out that the
difference is indeed In fact, we can write
Intuitively, it may feel like the number gets
closer and closer to without ever reaching When
analysed rigorously, we find that
Both numbers are exactly equal and their difference is exactly
Algebric Demonstration
Before we get into a proper proof, it might be worthwhile
demonstrating the equality above algebraically.
Let us first write
Multiplying both sides by we get
That was quite straightforward but not rigorous. We will discuss
more about it in a moment.
Another Algebric Demonstration
Let us see another similar demonstration. We let
and obtain
Subtracting from both sides, we get
Dividing both sides by we get
Thus
Now it is worth noting here that these algebraic demonstrations are
not rigorous proofs because we have not shown that the elementary
rules for addition and multiplication extend to repeating decimal
numbers too. They do but we have not demonstrated that here.
However, this is a good start to challenge any faulty intuition that
might have led one to doubt the above equality. While there are
many ways to prove this equality, one easy way is to rely on the
formula for the infinite geometric series which has a sound basis in
real analysis.
Infinite Geometric Series
Let us denote as
Note that the RHS is an infinite geometric series. From the study
of real analysis, we know that
where and are real numbers and Now let and to get
The LHS is and the RHS is so we get
Now one might argue that here too we did not prove the formula for
geometric series. That is true but the point of this article is not
to establish the basic theorems of real analysis but instead to show
that we can use known theorems to convince ourselves beyond any
doubt that is indeed exactly equal to
Relying on the formula for geometric series provides us a convenient
starting point without compromising on rigour. In particular, this
analytic proof depends on the convergence of the geometric series
when The proof of convergence can be
found in any introductory book on real analysis.
Avoiding Infinity
In this section, we will take a close look at the LHS above. The
LHS seems to have a sum of an infinite number of terms but we cannot
literally add infinite terms together, can we? What does the LHS
mean then?
Adding infinite number of terms is not a valid operation. Infinity
is not a number. It is a notion, a notion that we
can better understand, in this context, using limits. When we write
what we really mean can be expressed formally as follows:
By the definition of limit of sequence, what the above equation
means is that for every real there exists a
positive integer such that for all we have
The above inequality is telling us that no matter how small a
positive real number we choose for we can find large
enough threshold for such that for all values of
equal to or above that threshold, the difference between and
becomes smaller than
In simpler words, the difference between and can be made as small as we want simply by adding
enough number of terms to the latter. To summarise, we have shown
using the definition of limit of a sequence that
This is one of several ways to show that
There are several other proofs too but I believe this is one of the
very approachable ones.